What White Lotus, Glass Onion, and Triangle of Sadness imply about culture

EHzh...6AzB
25 Mar 2024
50

q: What do Triangle of Sadness, White Lotus, Squid Game, Glass Onion and Parasite all have in common?
A: A vibe shift against the rich.

The White Lotus Season 2 Cast (source: HBO)

2022 saw the release of the second season of White Lotus, a social satire about wealthy visitors of a fictional resort chain, Triangle of Sadness, a black-comedy satire about wealthy guests on a luxury cruise, and finally, Glass Onion, a murder mystery about an out of touch tech billionaire and his friends on a weekend getaway. None of these pieces are particularly kind to the rich. Despite the fabulous locales, all present being wealthy as a kind of prison of self-delusion, insecurity, and interpersonal competition with those supposedly closest to you.
As usual, Ana Andjelic nails the cultural moment in her piece ‘The Other Vibe Shift:’

If the wealthy are so out-of-touch, morally corrupt and repulsive as the social satire represents them, who wants to be like them?

I had a similar conclusion while watching Neflix’s Glass Onion.
But, if being rich becomes a joke (or at least not as aspirational as it once was), what does that mean for luxury brands, which trade on financial exclusivity?
Glass Onion’s cast. (Source: Netflix)

What the cultural vibe shift means for brands: A splintering of luxury.

Luxury is most often associated with the aspiration of wealth. I have this watch because I am part of an elite successful group who can afford it. But as the rich get richer, luxury becomes less about money, and more about access. You might be able to afford the watch, but that doesn’t mean you can buy it.
Ferrari, Audemars Piguet, and Hermès have followed an access strategy for years.
Brands targeting the .01% will continue to get creative with how they allocate access at the top — to limited editions, to exclusive experiences, to other members of the Elite — because it is a way to separate the mere rich from the uber rich (and turn aspiration from one elite class to another into profit).
For the rest of us (aka the brands courting the top 2%, not the .01%), luxury is also undergoing a shift from financial exclusivity to something else.

What underpins the cultural shift is a loss of aspiration for the wealthy ‘elite’

“Aspirationally, we already turned against the wealthy.“
- Ana Andjelic

The main characters in Triangle of Sadness, White Lotus, Glass Onion are revealed to be vapid, liars, and as imperfect as the rest of society. But the story has been playing out in the media over the past few years. Elon Musk’s rapid fall from green energy visionary to ruthless (and not necessarily successful) Twitter CEO represents a crack in the facade of the rich, successful, genius entrepreneur.
2022’s scandal-laden start-up implosions like cryptocurrency platform FTX, payments company Fast, and fintech Bolt, as well as general-easy come, easy-go venture capital money imply that wealth is less tied to hard work and genius, and more to connections and showmanship.
Two of the main actors in Triangle of Sadness. (source: YouTube)

Where is aspiration headed?

I am not sure 100% (who is?) but I have some ideas. In general — what’s aspirational will come from something more than being able to afford a product with a logo.

In a word: Substance

Aspiration is human; it won’t go away. But it will shift, or really, expand, from just money, to a display of something more.
Some trend-predictions for 2023:

1. Do the work as aspiration

Aspirational brands will require you to show you can’t just afford something. But you have done something. Maybe Patagonia only sells you a jacket if you have planted a tree or volunteered at their eco-center. Peloton launches a ‘#didthework’ line of outfits for those that show up 150 of the last 300 days. YETI makes a fisherman’s only line.
As mentioned earlier, limiting access has long been a super-luxury strategy. But I see it going to mainstream luxury in 2023 and beyond.


Aspiration isn’t buying the logo. It’s deserving the logo.

2. Creativity (and style) as aspiration—

My favorite fashion item I bought this winter isn’t a trendy piece that everyone else has. It’s a bright multicolored jacket, and I am not sure of the brand. It’s fun. It’s weird. I don’t think anyone I know has it. I hope they don’t. I like it, because, in an admission of my own vanity, I think it shows a bit of originality. And I predict a bigger shift in this direction. Aspiration will flow to those with their own look— unique, but unlike me, seemingly effortless.
Retailers like CultMia, which emphasize globally-sourced, ‘conversation-starting’ pieces will replace standing in line for the Louis Vuitton bag everyone has, or following the current trend.
One of Cult Mia’s best selling items is not made for those looking to blend in.

3. Mental peace (and lowkey 4-D chess) as aspiration —

Interestingly, the most aspirational character in White Lotus S2 was not necessarily the non-rich characters, which is what the vibe shift would suggest. It was Meghann Fahy’s Daphne Sullivan. At first, Daphne appears as vain and deluded as the rest of the cast.
White Lotus’ Daphne Sullivan. (source: Fabio Lovino/HBO)
Aubrey Plaza’s Harper character sees Daphne’s chirpy outlook as fake, and even mocks her. Yet, by the end of the season, Daphne is revealed to be the only wealthy character with a real handle on life, the ability to accept the good with the bad, and live life on her terms.
Per Esquire:

[Aubrey] Plaza has set her eye-rolls to stun in the role; she’s suitably disgusted with the world, and even more turned off by how rich people can drown out those problems in nice hotels. That worldview has its limits, and you sense that Daphne has long let such delusions go. She likely never laboured under them to begin with. Instead, Daphne sees the world of The White Lotus, with all its five-star trappings, for what it is: gorgeous, limiting, and a really fun ride.

While other cast members go through personal breakdowns, substance abuse, and interpersonal conflict, Daphne is at peace. Even after experiencing a stunning betrayal of her own, Daphne manages to go through emotions of surprise, hurt, anger, acceptance, and plan suitable revenge… in about 15 seconds.
Her attitude has even become a 2023 resolution:


“Don’t you think it’s better to just do what you want?” — Daphne Sullivan


How does Daphne apply to luxury?

Luxury is often associated with a lack of emotion. Stoic store associates. Tense discussions behind closed doors only. I don’t see that changing. I see it going further: control of your emotions and a Daphne-like attitude leads to an ability to live life for what it is and to enjoy every moment. To be present. And to take advantage of life’s one truly scarce resource: Time.
Those that spend their lives being jealous and vengeful are not aspirational. Aspirational people show no need to prove to everyone that they are smart or successful or even ‘above it all.’ Instead, the luxury muses will be like Daphne —happy in the moment, confident in their choices (basic or not), and secretly more cunning than you initially give them credit for.

Don’t miss out on brand insights — Sign up for monthly emails on brand marketing.

Looking for help growing your brand?

I run brand consultancy Embedded — where I partner with companies on growth and brand strategy.
Not sure where to start? Many clients opt for ad-hoc coaching — hourly consultations on any aspect of your marketing and brand strategy. Get in touch here.

Write & Read to Earn with BULB

Learn More

Enjoy this blog? Subscribe to jihad

1 Comment

B
No comments yet.
Most relevant comments are displayed, so some may have been filtered out.