For centuries, families and societies have woven myths about birth order, claiming that the position in which a child is born shapes their personality, destiny, and even future success. Among these, the so-called “second-born child” myth stands out: the belief that second children are either destined to be rebellious, overlooked, or perpetually stuck in the shadow of their older sibling. But how much truth lies behind this stereotype?

The Origins of the Myth

The fascination with birth order can be traced back to early psychology, particularly the work of Alfred Adler in the late 19th and early 20th century. Adler suggested that first-borns might grow up more responsible and achievement-driven, while later-borns (including second-borns) were more likely to be competitive or seek attention in unconventional ways. This idea filtered into popular culture, cementing the “second-born rebel” myth.

Common Beliefs About Second-Borns

1. The Rebel – Second-borns are often cast as defiant, driven to push against family norms in order to carve out their own identity.
2. The Peacemaker – Some argue they become diplomatic, learning early to mediate between older and younger siblings.
3. The Overlooked Child – A frequent stereotype is that parents, more relaxed after their firstborn, give less attention to the second, forcing them to find other ways to stand out.

Examples in History and Culture

• Princess Margaret (Second daughter of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth) – Known for her lively, nonconforming spirit, she often lived in contrast to her elder sister, Queen Elizabeth II. Margaret embodied the stereotype of the rebellious, overlooked second child who challenged tradition.
• Elon Musk’s younger brother, Kimbal Musk – While not as globally famous as his older sibling, Kimbal carved a unique identity in sustainable food and restaurants. This illustrates the “shadow effect,” where the second-born is often compared to a dominant firstborn but still finds their niche.
• Prince Harry – As the younger brother of Prince William, he has frequently been painted as the classic “second-born rebel.” From his military service to his eventual step away from royal duties, Harry’s journey fits the narrative of forging independence from a role defined by birth order.

The Counter-Argument: More Myth Than Fact

Modern research suggests that while family dynamics shape personality, birth order alone is not a determining factor. A 2015 study by the University of Leipzig, involving over 20,000 participants, found no consistent differences in personality traits based purely on whether someone was a first, second, or later-born child. Factors like parenting style, socioeconomic status, and sibling spacing play far greater roles.

Why the Myth Persists

Stories and stereotypes are sticky. Families often reinforce them through casual labels: “the responsible one,” “the wild one,” or “the baby of the family.” These narratives can become self-fulfilling, as children lean into the roles they believe are expected of them.

Final Thoughts

The myth of the “second-born” persists because it simplifies the complexities of sibling relationships into easy-to-remember stories. While history and pop culture provide vivid examples of rebellious or overlooked second-borns, science shows that individuality goes far beyond birth order. Rather than destiny, being the “second-born” may just be another thread in the rich fabric of personality shaped by family, culture, and choice.
Would you like me to make this article more formal and research-heavy (like for an academic journal), or more casual and family-friendly (like something for a parenting magazine)?

References

• Adler, A. (1927). Understanding Human Nature. New York: Greenberg.

• Brown, T. (2022). The Palace Papers: Inside the House of Windsor – the Truth and the Turmoil. New York: Random House.

• Lacey, R. (2002). Royal: Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. London: Little, Brown.

• Rohrer, J. M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2015). Examining the effects of birth order on personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(46), 14224–14229.

• Vance, A. (2015). Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future. New York: HarperCollins.