The Creator Economy Wants to Break Free

Creators across major platforms are facing another wave of unpredictable visibility drops. In recent months, YouTube channels - even large ones with consistent publishing - have reported steep declines in reach, with no official changes acknowledged. Instagram continues to penalize accounts that mention competitor platforms like TikTok or Substack, while TikTok’s vague enforcement and alleged “shadow bans” leave creators unsure why their content stops performing. The pattern has become already familiar: policy changes, algorithm shifts, and unexplained suppression - each reminding creators that they’re building businesses on borrowed land.

But last year some of the biggest content creators started speaking up and pushing back.
MrBeast, YouTube’s most successful creator, publicly criticized the platform’s revenue-sharing system during a podcast back in September.

“I’m basically paying YouTube to distribute my content,” he said. “They keep the majority of the ad revenue I generate.”

The comment resonated with many other creators, because it named what they’d long felt but hadn’t voiced: they’re doing the work, building the audiences, driving the views — but they’re still dependent, forced to accept the short end of the stick. The idea that a platform can take more than it gives, while setting all the rules, was finally being called out for what it was. Within weeks, other top creators joined in voicing the same frustration.

They had built multi-million dollar businesses around platforms where the payouts were unpredictable, the rules changed often and, the worst of all, their audiences that sometimes took years to build, could disappear in a matter of days.

The realization that their success could vanish overnight through algorithm changes, policy updates, or platform decisions sparked a broader conversation about ownership in digital media.

TikTok’s near-ban in the United States crystallized these fears. Creators with millions of followers faced losing their primary income source due to geopolitical tensions they had no influence over. The episode demonstrated how platform dependency creates existential risk for anyone building a digital business.

The Architecture of Digital Feudalism

Platform capitalism operates through what researchers call infrastructural capture. Users create content, generate data, and build audiences, but platforms retain ownership of the underlying infrastructure. This arrangement worked when platforms provided value that creators couldn’t access elsewhere: global distribution, payment processing, content hosting, and audience discovery.

But the value equation has changed. Creators now bring their own audiences across platforms, manage their own brand relationships, and often drive more traffic than they receive. Meanwhile, platforms have become increasingly extractive. YouTube creators typically earn around $5–15 RPM (revenue per 1,000 views), while ad rates paid by advertisers- the total CPM - can be $7–20 per 1,000 or even higher in certain markets (red11media).

The European Union’s Digital Services Act, which took effect January 1, 2024, requires platforms to provide users with more control over algorithmic content curation. This regulatory pressure acknowledges what creators have long argued: platform algorithms unfairly control the distribution of user-generated content for platform benefit rather than creator benefit.

The Ownership Alternative

New technological infrastructure enables different economic arrangements. Blockchain-based platforms like Lens Protocol and Farcaster allow creators to own their social graphs - the network of relationships between them and their followers. When creators move between platforms, they can take their audience relationships with them.

This technical capability has profound economic implications. Platform switching costs drop dramatically when creators maintain direct relationships with their audiences. Network effects - the moats that protected platform monopolies - weaken when user relationships exist independently of any single platform.

Mirror, a decentralized publishing platform, demonstrates this shift in practice. Writers can publish content that exists permanently on distributed networks while maintaining ownership of their subscriber relationships. Revenue sharing happens through smart contracts rather than platform policies. Creators receive 90–95% of subscription revenue compared to 70% on platforms like Substack.

The numbers tell the story. According to recent data from DeFi Pulse, creator-focused decentralized platforms processed over $2.8 billion in direct creator payments in 2024 - up 340% from the previous year. This growth represents real economic migration from platform-controlled to creator-controlled infrastructure.

Beyond Content Creation

The ownership model extends beyond traditional media creation. Software developers have begun using blockchain networks to distribute applications without depending on app store policies. Game developers release titles where players own in-game assets rather than renting them from game companies. Musicians sell albums as non-fungible tokens, capturing revenue that would typically go to record labels and streaming platforms.

Each example follows the same pattern: creators using new infrastructure to capture more value from their work while reducing dependency on intermediary platforms. The technology enables what economist Albert Hirschman called “exit” rather than “voice” - leaving systems rather than trying to reform them.

We remember, how back in 2021, digital artist Pak shocked the whole world by generating $91.8 million in direct sales through blockchain-based art platforms, completely bypassing traditional gallery systems. The sale showed that digital creators could access premium markets directly rather than through institutional gatekeepers.

The Network Effects Reversal

Platform monopolies depended on network effects: the more users a platform attracted, the more valuable it became for everyone. But creator-owned infrastructure reverses this dynamic. When creators control their audience relationships and revenue streams, they can selectively use whichever platforms provide the best services rather than remaining locked into any single ecosystem.

This shift parallels what happened in web hosting. In the early internet, companies depended on large hosting providers who could restrict or control their online presence. Today, businesses can easily migrate between hosting services or run their own infrastructure. The same evolution is happening with creator economy infrastructure.

The New Digital Space and What SourceLess Is Building For

At SourceLess, we’re developing infrastructure designed for this next chapter where creators will be able to build their own platforms.

Instead of relying on rented space in someone else’s cloud, creators on SourceLess can deploy apps, tools, and communities across a decentralized computing mesh. That means no lock-in, no hidden filters, no back-end gatekeepers.

• STR.Domains let you own your digital name, brand, and presence — portable, persistent, and verifiable.
• STR Talk provides private communication tied directly to your identity.
• ARES Ai supports creators in navigating, building, and connecting — without being trained to upsell or surveil.
• Ccoin Finance makes sending, storing, and earning with your funds direct, private, and fully under your control.

And it’s all being built to run on SLNN Mesh — a peer-to-peer web layer designed to connect people directly, without relying on centralized infrastructure. It’s already live in Constanța, Romania, and currently in testing as we expand it into a full, user-owned communication and identity layer.

We’re aiming for an infrastructure shift from algorithmic dependence to digital sovereignty. For creators. For communities. For people building to last.

Explore the decentralized tools SourceLess is building for creators, communities, and beyond.
SourceLess