The Quantum Dilemma: Is Blockchain in Danger?

12 Mar 2024

In a world where technology is advancing by leaps and bounds, quantum computing is emerging as the titan that could redefine the rules of the cybersecurity game. With its ability to perform calculations at unimaginable speeds, the question that resonates in digital corridors is: What would happen if a quantum computer breached the blockchain?

The blockchain, that immutable and decentralized data structure, has been the bulwark of digital security, especially in the field of cryptocurrencies. Its strength lies in public key cryptography, a system that until now has been impregnable. But is it really invulnerable to quantum power?

But let's explain in a simple way what the problem would be:

Imagine that the blockchain is like a very complex lock that protects information. This lock uses cryptography, which is like a system of combinations that is very difficult to decipher without the correct key. Now, the computers we use today would try to guess the combination one by one, which would take an incredibly long time.
On the other hand, a quantum computer works very differently. Thanks to the laws of quantum physics, you can perform many calculations at the same time. This would be like you could try all the lock combinations at once, finding the right one in much less time.

In blockchain terms, this means that a quantum computer could, in theory, decipher the cryptographic keys that keep transactions and funds secure, much faster than any normal computer could. It's like you have a quantum “master key.”
However, it is important to mention that quantum technology is still in development and has not reached the capacity to break blockchain in practice. Additionally, security experts are already working on new forms of cryptography that would be resistant even to quantum computers.

Quantum computing and blockchain experts are divided. On the one hand, there are those who claim that the arrival of quantum computers could mean the end of blockchain as we know it. These machines could, in theory, decrypt cryptographic keys in the blink of an eye, leaving user transactions and funds exposed.

However, other researchers, such as Yavi Altshuler of MIT, maintain that although quantum computers are advancing rapidly, there is no concrete evidence that they can compromise the integrity of the blockchain. This debate is not merely academic, as it has direct implications for the trust and stability of digital financial markets.

The fear is not unfounded. About a year ago, Google announced that it had achieved quantum supremacy, causing a drop of nearly 10% in the price of Bitcoin, demonstrating the market's sensitivity to the mere possibility of a quantum threat.

But is this the harbinger of a perfect storm or just a passing cloud on the technological horizon?

Blockchain developers are taking proactive steps to protect networks against potential quantum threats. One of the strategies is the development of post-quantum cryptography, which would be resistant even to the powerful calculations of a quantum computer. For example, a five-step framework has been proposed to add a post-quantum cryptographic layer to most blockchain networks without needing to modify the base protocols. Additionally, a scalable implementation has been developed for Ethereum-based networks that uses Hyperledger Besu as the blockchain protocol.

Another measure is collaboration between quantum researchers, blockchain developers and security experts to address this emerging threat effectively. This collaborative approach is key to ensuring the longevity and security of cryptocurrencies in the quantum age.

In conclusion, although quantum computing poses a formidable challenge, blockchain is not doomed to obsolescence. The race between cryptographic security and quantum computing power is on, and only time will tell who will emerge victorious in this digital contest.

Write & Read to Earn with BULB

Learn More

Enjoy this blog? Subscribe to ErenG


No comments yet.
Most relevant comments are displayed, so some may have been filtered out.